<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear power: the new generation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carboncommentary.com/2008/01/14/70/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2008/01/14/70</link>
	<description>A critical appraisal of issues in the move to a low-carbon economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Commentary &#183; Why might nuclear be necessary?</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2008/01/14/70/comment-page-1#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon Commentary &#183; Why might nuclear be necessary?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/2008/01/14/70#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>[...] of the new Finnish reactor, now several years and several million euros over budget (see here and here). I can see no reason to believe that nuclear construction in the UK will not be dogged by similar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the new Finnish reactor, now several years and several million euros over budget (see here and here). I can see no reason to believe that nuclear construction in the UK will not be dogged by similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cato's Jerry Taylor: &#34;Nuclear power is solar power for conservatives&#34; and nuclear needs &#34;a policy of tough love&#34; - TT`s Lost in Tokyo</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2008/01/14/70/comment-page-1#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Cato's Jerry Taylor: &#34;Nuclear power is solar power for conservatives&#34; and nuclear needs &#34;a policy of tough love&#34; - TT`s Lost in Tokyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/2008/01/14/70#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>[...] Investors are also wary of nuclear plants because of the construction delays and cost over-runs that have historically plagued the industry. ...&#160; Nor have these construction delays had anything to do with regulatory obstruction or organized public opposition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Investors are also wary of nuclear plants because of the construction delays and cost over-runs that have historically plagued the industry. &#8230;&nbsp; Nor have these construction delays had anything to do with regulatory obstruction or organized public opposition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris rawley</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2008/01/14/70/comment-page-1#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>chris rawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/2008/01/14/70#comment-462</guid>
		<description>It is simply because of a lack of skilled personnel to carry out the works. This some thing that seriously needs to be addressed. Soon rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is simply because of a lack of skilled personnel to carry out the works. This some thing that seriously needs to be addressed. Soon rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
