<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American public opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/03/23/523/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/03/23/523</link>
	<description>A critical appraisal of issues in the move to a low-carbon economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/03/23/523/comment-page-1#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=523#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there increased concern among the American public about water scarcity?

I think the main problem here is that many people aren&#039;t connecting the dots. Someone may be unconcerned about air temperature changes in isolation but very concerned about dwindling water supplies. I suspect that once segments of the American public connect the dots (like they have in Australia) you&#039;ll see a paradigm shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there increased concern among the American public about water scarcity?</p>
<p>I think the main problem here is that many people aren&#8217;t connecting the dots. Someone may be unconcerned about air temperature changes in isolation but very concerned about dwindling water supplies. I suspect that once segments of the American public connect the dots (like they have in Australia) you&#8217;ll see a paradigm shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prokrity</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/03/23/523/comment-page-1#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>Prokrity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=523#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>I feel sad reading the article. There should not be any doubt about the seriousness and grave consequence of the global warming. What action should be taken by us to fight it may be a subject to debate. But not the obvious truth that our earth is getting warmer. Also there should not be any doubt that certain portion of the warming is natural and certain portion of this warming is manmade/womanmade. Which part contributing what percentage can be subject to debate. It is not the first time we are facing a global warming. But this is the first global warming when the world population is more than 6.5 billion. This is the first global warming when you are not free to migrate from one place to another (you need  visa to cross boarders). At present in Bangladesh per capita land is only 100feet by 100feet; what a disaster they will face if one third of their land goes under water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel sad reading the article. There should not be any doubt about the seriousness and grave consequence of the global warming. What action should be taken by us to fight it may be a subject to debate. But not the obvious truth that our earth is getting warmer. Also there should not be any doubt that certain portion of the warming is natural and certain portion of this warming is manmade/womanmade. Which part contributing what percentage can be subject to debate. It is not the first time we are facing a global warming. But this is the first global warming when the world population is more than 6.5 billion. This is the first global warming when you are not free to migrate from one place to another (you need  visa to cross boarders). At present in Bangladesh per capita land is only 100feet by 100feet; what a disaster they will face if one third of their land goes under water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Climate &#187; Archive &#187; American public opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/03/23/523/comment-page-1#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Climate &#187; Archive &#187; American public opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=523#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>[...] Sciencedude placed an observative post today on American public opinionHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIt could be that the media has changed, not the average American. &#8230; as convincing as they were should spend less time on temperatures and more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sciencedude placed an observative post today on American public opinionHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIt could be that the media has changed, not the average American. &#8230; as convincing as they were should spend less time on temperatures and more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

