<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biochar proponents get spammed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/04/07/539/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/04/07/539</link>
	<description>A critical appraisal of issues in the move to a low-carbon economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Kadir-Buxton</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/04/07/539/comment-page-1#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kadir-Buxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/04/07/539#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>It is becoming clear to a few that we need to both adopt a near-zero CO2 plan so that we produce no more CO2, and also use biochar to get rid of the CO2 that we have already produced. Convincing the rest will take time that we do not have. What we need to do is make politicians wages inversely proportional to CO2 levels. They will soon start acting on this crisis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is becoming clear to a few that we need to both adopt a near-zero CO2 plan so that we produce no more CO2, and also use biochar to get rid of the CO2 that we have already produced. Convincing the rest will take time that we do not have. What we need to do is make politicians wages inversely proportional to CO2 levels. They will soon start acting on this crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/04/07/539/comment-page-1#comment-1890</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/04/07/539#comment-1890</guid>
		<description>&quot;– stored in the soil is equivalent to reducing the world’s emissions by a similar amount, so it makes good sense to give it equal weight to other carbon reduction technologies.)&quot;


Just a slight  correction; 1 ton of biochar sequestered = 3.67 tons of CO2 removed from the carbon cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;– stored in the soil is equivalent to reducing the world’s emissions by a similar amount, so it makes good sense to give it equal weight to other carbon reduction technologies.)&#8221;</p>
<p>Just a slight  correction; 1 ton of biochar sequestered = 3.67 tons of CO2 removed from the carbon cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disarming the Biochar Wars &#124; re:char</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/04/07/539/comment-page-1#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>Disarming the Biochar Wars &#124; re:char</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/04/07/539#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>[...] to link to this article, as anti-biochar crusaders have resorted to unacceptable tactics such as spamming notable scientists such as Dr. James [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to link to this article, as anti-biochar crusaders have resorted to unacceptable tactics such as spamming notable scientists such as Dr. James [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
