<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the proposed UK feed-in tariffs high enough to stimulate investment in small-scale generation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/07/15/686/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/07/15/686</link>
	<description>A critical appraisal of issues in the move to a low-carbon economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/07/15/686/comment-page-1#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=686#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>The feed in tariffs have now been set at 41.3 p per unit generated is it not time that you changed the maths on this page to show what you will get.

Also a twelve year payback is not bad as this is really showing a 8% return, on something that will add value to your home, and as energy prices rise so will the return,, so if electricity charges rise by 60% in 6 years as suggested by OFGEM, then your return will be a lot more as the energy you export will rise and the generation tariff will rise by inflation and this is all tax free, the whole deal is a lot better than putting the money in the bank and getting a staggering return of 2-3%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The feed in tariffs have now been set at 41.3 p per unit generated is it not time that you changed the maths on this page to show what you will get.</p>
<p>Also a twelve year payback is not bad as this is really showing a 8% return, on something that will add value to your home, and as energy prices rise so will the return,, so if electricity charges rise by 60% in 6 years as suggested by OFGEM, then your return will be a lot more as the energy you export will rise and the generation tariff will rise by inflation and this is all tax free, the whole deal is a lot better than putting the money in the bank and getting a staggering return of 2-3%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Commentary &#183; UK feed-in tariffs: buy your hectare of woodland now</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/07/15/686/comment-page-1#comment-2895</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon Commentary &#183; UK feed-in tariffs: buy your hectare of woodland now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=686#comment-2895</guid>
		<description>[...]  An earlier article on this topic which looks in more detail on the incentives to take up the new &#8216;feed-in tariffs&#8217; is here.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  An earlier article on this topic which looks in more detail on the incentives to take up the new &#8216;feed-in tariffs&#8217; is here.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/07/15/686/comment-page-1#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=686#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>I think you also need to take into account the lifetime of the inverter - this might only last 8-10 years and is reasonably expensive.

I came across a reasonably good article on PV economics from the US which made this point &#039;The Market Value and Cost of
Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production&#039;
Severin Borenstein
January 

The cost of a 10kW PV installation in 2007 quoted in the article was $80,000, with the inverter cost $8,000 - per article &quot;After installation, the largest cost that the owner of a solar PV system is expected to
face is for replacing the inverter. Median time-to-failure estimates for inverters range from 5-10 years, so I assume 8 years, which implies that the inverter will have to be replaced twice over the 25-year life of the panels, assumed to occur in years 8 and 16. Current
inverter cost for a 10kW system is in the range of $8000, but that is likely to decline over time. Inverter costs are assumed to decline by 2% per year in real terms, consistent with a study by Navigant consulting (2006) for National Renewable Energy Laboratory.2008&quot;

The really interesting question however is how large wind farms and small microgeneration interact in the market - if the goal is less CO2emissions and greater fuel security, from which does society get a better return for each £ invested? - nobody appears to be looking at this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you also need to take into account the lifetime of the inverter &#8211; this might only last 8-10 years and is reasonably expensive.</p>
<p>I came across a reasonably good article on PV economics from the US which made this point &#8216;The Market Value and Cost of<br />
Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production&#8217;<br />
Severin Borenstein<br />
January </p>
<p>The cost of a 10kW PV installation in 2007 quoted in the article was $80,000, with the inverter cost $8,000 &#8211; per article &#8220;After installation, the largest cost that the owner of a solar PV system is expected to<br />
face is for replacing the inverter. Median time-to-failure estimates for inverters range from 5-10 years, so I assume 8 years, which implies that the inverter will have to be replaced twice over the 25-year life of the panels, assumed to occur in years 8 and 16. Current<br />
inverter cost for a 10kW system is in the range of $8000, but that is likely to decline over time. Inverter costs are assumed to decline by 2% per year in real terms, consistent with a study by Navigant consulting (2006) for National Renewable Energy Laboratory.2008&#8243;</p>
<p>The really interesting question however is how large wind farms and small microgeneration interact in the market &#8211; if the goal is less CO2emissions and greater fuel security, from which does society get a better return for each £ invested? &#8211; nobody appears to be looking at this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

