<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How long do solar panels last?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/08/04/711/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/08/04/711</link>
	<description>A critical appraisal of issues in the move to a low-carbon economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:50:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottish power</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/08/04/711/comment-page-1#comment-2503</link>
		<dc:creator>scottish power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=711#comment-2503</guid>
		<description>I, like millions of my fellow laymen Scots cannot see any future for Solar Power in our country, sun is not a commoidy that we enjoy in abundance. All the investment should go into wind-based tech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, like millions of my fellow laymen Scots cannot see any future for Solar Power in our country, sun is not a commoidy that we enjoy in abundance. All the investment should go into wind-based tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith-Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/08/04/711/comment-page-1#comment-2486</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith-Gibbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=711#comment-2486</guid>
		<description>Chris, I don&#039;t know where you got this from - &quot;This will vary slightly ... between different types of silicon.&quot;

There&#039;s no &quot;slightly&quot; about it.  Old types of amorphous silicon would go into noticeable decline within 5-8 years.  I gather they&#039;re more stable now, out to 15 years. But it&#039;s been understood at least since 1992 (the first time I worked with PV) that monocrystalline silicon would have a much longer, much more stable lifetime.  Mono is remarkably stable: it&#039;s possible that we&#039;ll be re-encapsulating 20th-century mono cells into new panels for many decades to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I don&#8217;t know where you got this from &#8211; &#8220;This will vary slightly &#8230; between different types of silicon.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no &#8220;slightly&#8221; about it.  Old types of amorphous silicon would go into noticeable decline within 5-8 years.  I gather they&#8217;re more stable now, out to 15 years. But it&#8217;s been understood at least since 1992 (the first time I worked with PV) that monocrystalline silicon would have a much longer, much more stable lifetime.  Mono is remarkably stable: it&#8217;s possible that we&#8217;ll be re-encapsulating 20th-century mono cells into new panels for many decades to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Commentary · How long do solar panels last? &#124; Solar Panels California</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/08/04/711/comment-page-1#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon Commentary · How long do solar panels last? &#124; Solar Panels California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=711#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more from the original source: Carbon Commentary · How long do solar panels last? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the original source: Carbon Commentary · How long do solar panels last? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
