A new piece of research shows that potential Conservative voters in the UK are typically slightly less supportive of strong environmental policies than the population as a whole. Undecided voters that the Tories want to attract into their camp are generally even less convinced by eco-friendly political initiatives. Although the party leadership remains eager to portray itself with a greenish tinge, the lack of support among voters will tend to circumscribe the freedom to propose radical ideas for the 2010 election. If your target voters are wary of strong environmental policies, you don’t propose them in the run-up to an election.
Not unexpectedly, Tory voters want green policies to be focused on investment in emissions-reducing technologies and tend to reject any increase in taxes or restrictions on economic freedoms. So, for example, it will be difficult for the party to reject airport expansion strongly.
***
Haddock Research, a Canadian marketing research company has just published some details of its research into environmental attitudes in the UK, the US, and Canada itself. This short note focuses on the UK data. More information about other countries is available from Peter Winters at Haddock (peter.winters@haddock-research.com).
Haddock’s field work was carried out a year ago but the research’s general conclusions are likely to be broadly applicable today. The company asked 1,050 UK residents whether they agreed or disagreed with some key environmental policies and it gave me full information on the split of opinions and political affiliations for four of the questions. In all but the first – investment in green transport – Conservative voters were slightly less ‘green’ than the UK average.
The four policies are:
- Investment in green transport
- Obliging companies to take energy-wasting or otherwise environmentally undesirable products off the market
- Restricting further expansion of airports
- Increasing taxes on car fuel
Investment in green transport
Across the political spectrum, a majority of people supported this policy. 75% of those questioned either agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that
As part of a programme of green taxation, in principle, I like the idea of our government investing in green technology related to transport
The percentages of people supporting political parties and agreeing with this statement were:
| Conservative | 75% |
| Labour | 77% |
| Liberal Democrat | 87% |
| Green | 89% |
| Undecided or unaligned | 68% |
| Average across all respondents | 75% |
|---|
The responses to this question by Conservative voters were strongly favourable. Undecided voters were somewhat less impressed by the policy, but a two-thirds majority in favour. The Conservatives can therefore push for policies of green investment in transport without strongly alienating the non-aligned voter.
Obliging companies to take energy-wasting or otherwise environmentally undesirable products off the market
This policy only achieved a small majority of people supporting it. 56% of people either agreed or strongly agreed with the following proposition:
There should be increasingly tough laws banning products which cause climate change
| Conservative | 52% |
| Labour | 62% |
| Liberal Democrat | 67% |
| Green | 87% |
| Undecided or unaligned | 52% |
| Average across all respondents | 56% |
|---|
Liberal Democrats and Greens strongly supported this policy but Conservatives and the undecideds were only marginally in favour. (About 30% of the interviewees declared themselves Conservative and about 40% were ‘undecided’.) It is unclear that this policy would attract many votes from floating voters. Labour voters were generally much more approving of bans of poor performing products.
Restricting further expansion of airports
Less than 50% of people supported this policy. (A further quarter were undecided.) The question was:
As part of a programme of green taxation, in principle, I like the idea of restricting further expansion of airports
| Conservative | 45% |
| Labour | 47% |
| Liberal Democrat | 57% |
| Green | 73% |
| Undecided or unaligned | 42% |
| Average across all respondents | 47% |
|---|
Once again, Conservatives were slightly less inclined to support this policy and non-aligned voters were even more equivocal. The Conservatives would therefore be taking a risk in pursuing this policy. Non-aligned voters are slightly less inclined to support this policy than declared Conservative respondents and there is therefore no obvious electoral advantage in planning to restrict airport growth.
Increasing taxes on car fuel
This is the most unpopular measure. Unsurprisingly, only 15% of people agree or strongly agree with this proposition:
As part of a programme of green taxation, in principle, I like the idea of increasing taxes on car fuel
| Conservative | 10% |
| Labour | 21% |
| Liberal Democrat | 19% |
| Green | 49% |
| Undecided or unaligned | 11% |
| Average across all respondents | 15% |
|---|
In this case, the percentage of Conservatives agreeing with the policy idea is actually very slightly lower than the percentage of undecideds. But both groups record very low support. Only the Greens can muster as much as 1 in 2 of their voters behind this proposition.
The overall results from the four questions are as follows:
- Undecided voters tend to be slightly more resistant to environmental initiatives than Conservatives. If the Tories are to attract this part of the electorate, they cannot be green radicals.
- Green taxation is very unpopular. Even the Green Party supporters are equivocal.
- ‘Choice editing’ – the removal of poor environmental performers from the shelves of shops – has only limited support.
- Green investment is one policy that all types of voters support, even the non-aligned segment.
Tags: Haddock Research, politics, public opinion
-
If I recall (I don’t have the report to hand here) the Green Fiscal Commission research, carried out by BMRB, found strong variations in poll responses to green taxation depending on how the question was asked. In particular, it got high levels of support when it was positioned as replacing existing taxes (e.g. on income or employment).
The problem here is not that green taxation is unpopular; it’s that politicians aren’t trusted not to finagle the tax take. That’s a different problem. Equally people respond differently to increases in fuel duty if they believe it is part of a policy of rebalancing vehicle taxation by reducing vehicle tax.
I’m assuming your final summary above is taken from their work, but it’s not actually supported by the data. For example: the summary says ‘choice editing’ has limited support when 56% on average are in favour (the last time I looked, 56% was a majority). And this reflects the findings in the SDC research as well. People don’t mind choice editing.
Finally, although the research no doubt positioned the response on the question about airports as ‘limited support’ or somesuch, from a research point of view they have asked a strong question (I like the idea of restricting the further expansion of airports) which goes against the entire weight of public policy on transport, and yet its supported by 47%, This is strikingly high figure.
Generally, polls which try to identify these sorts of political affiliation questions tends to have limited value without some attempt to probe strength of feeling as well – both around the policies and around the level of party affiliation. Often undecided or unaligned voters are likely not to vote at all.
Andrew
-
Andrew,
A bit of background, James Ambler and I met with Chris Goodall a few weeks ago and we agreed to send some data through to Chris for this article. But Chris is not representing Haddock at all (and I am not speaking for Chris in this comment). It’s been totally up to Chris what angle he chose to take on the article, and we didn’t ask to see it before he posted it etc.
If you would like to see the material we have, please consider the ‘Political Space’ series of articles on our website – http://www.haddock-research.com.
As on overall ‘backgrounder’ of our Environmental Choices study, see our Interim Highlights downloadable PDF at http://www.haddock-research.com/EC2008_interim_highlights
Some comments about some of your points:
1. I absolutely agree that question wording can make a big difference (and I’ve seen some interesting studies demonstrating the differences it can cause). Therefore, I am a strong believer in proving the exact methodology and statements on data charts (as you can see from our press releases), and allowing people to interpret what the data means.
2. I would disagree that it is just/mainly a matter of trust that would make carbon taxes popular (or at least acceptable). The October 2008 federal election in Canada was fought on a revenue neutral ‘Green Shift’ platform by the Liberals, but it really wasn’t popular with a great proportion of voters – especially as positioned as a ‘Carbon Tax’ by the Conservatives. But I suspect there is a complex cultural/political dynamic here, and what is possibly in (say) Denmark (which already has high car taxes) is not possible in Canada.
3. From our Interim Highlights (page 8), we write about airport expansion:
In England, there is greater public approval for restrictions on airport expansion than in either Canada or the US. This approval for airport restriction is well correlated with both ‘concern about climate change’ and ‘whether someone personally flies or not’. If you are a ‘Climate Citizen non-flyer’ in England, you would be pretty likely to resist further airport expansion! This demonstrates that a powerful segmentation approach often combines ‘attitudes towards climate change’ and ‘behaviour/incentives within a particular sector’. Page 8,
Peter
-
Andrew,
Following-up my point 2, you might be interested in the 2008 Liberal ‘Green Shift’ plan, which really tries to emphasize how the new taxes will not be extra taxes …
http://www.cbc.ca/newsatsixns/pdf/liberalgreenplan.pdf
page 22. “The Green Shift will shift Canada’s tax system away from income and towards pollution in a revenue-neutral way. That means by law, every penny that is raised in pollution taxes will be returned to Canadians through tax cuts.”



3 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/12/03/938/trackback