<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Committee on Climate Change shouldn&#8217;t have answered the question it was asked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/12/10/1007/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/12/10/1007</link>
	<description>A critical appraisal of issues in the move to a low-carbon economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie and Coffee &#187; A Green Senate? A Sustainability Commissioner?</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/12/10/1007/comment-page-1#comment-2975</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie and Coffee &#187; A Green Senate? A Sustainability Commissioner?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=1007#comment-2975</guid>
		<description>[...] the leading critic of liberal neutrality! (A recent example of such a lapse has been pointed out by Chris Goodall: The Committee on Climate Change shouldn’t have answered the question it was asked [....)  Published in: Environment, Green Party, Lent &#124; on February 24th, 2010  &#124; Permanent Link to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the leading critic of liberal neutrality! (A recent example of such a lapse has been pointed out by Chris Goodall: The Committee on Climate Change shouldn’t have answered the question it was asked [....)  Published in: Environment, Green Party, Lent | on February 24th, 2010  | Permanent Link to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2009/12/10/1007/comment-page-1#comment-2773</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=1007#comment-2773</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not ready to argue that 10% biofuel by 2050 is too low, but I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if that is not a considerable underestimate.

Some of the biofuel plants such as jatropha and switchgrass grow nicely on marginal land which is not adequate for food production.  It might be possible to produce a lot of biofuel while taking over no existing agricultural land.

Switchgrass is a feedstock for ethanol.  I don&#039;t know if ethanol could be blended into jet fuel.  

Switchgrass is a very promising plant as it greatly improves the land on which it grows and sequesters a significant amount of carbon.  Approximately 80% of its mass is below ground in its extensive root system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not ready to argue that 10% biofuel by 2050 is too low, but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if that is not a considerable underestimate.</p>
<p>Some of the biofuel plants such as jatropha and switchgrass grow nicely on marginal land which is not adequate for food production.  It might be possible to produce a lot of biofuel while taking over no existing agricultural land.</p>
<p>Switchgrass is a feedstock for ethanol.  I don&#8217;t know if ethanol could be blended into jet fuel.  </p>
<p>Switchgrass is a very promising plant as it greatly improves the land on which it grows and sequesters a significant amount of carbon.  Approximately 80% of its mass is below ground in its extensive root system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
