<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two good software tools for calculating emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carboncommentary.com/2010/01/08/1150/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2010/01/08/1150</link>
	<description>A critical appraisal of issues in the move to a low-carbon economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wookey</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2010/01/08/1150/comment-page-1#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>Wookey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=1150#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>I agree imeasure is a very useful tool. Sign up now, start using it. 

Footprinter, on the hand, doesn&#039;t work at all with free tools - it requires the Adobe Flashplayer and won&#039;t work at all with Free replacements. That&#039;s no use at all in my book - the web is good because important technologies are not proprietary. Software authors that ignore gnash and swfdec should not be rewarded with users. You wouldn&#039;t like a proprietary web - remember what happened when all the browser authours started providing their own proprietary extensions, and it got really hard to write a web-page that everyone could read? Well, it&#039;ll be 100 times worse than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree imeasure is a very useful tool. Sign up now, start using it. </p>
<p>Footprinter, on the hand, doesn&#8217;t work at all with free tools &#8211; it requires the Adobe Flashplayer and won&#8217;t work at all with Free replacements. That&#8217;s no use at all in my book &#8211; the web is good because important technologies are not proprietary. Software authors that ignore gnash and swfdec should not be rewarded with users. You wouldn&#8217;t like a proprietary web &#8211; remember what happened when all the browser authours started providing their own proprietary extensions, and it got really hard to write a web-page that everyone could read? Well, it&#8217;ll be 100 times worse than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightbulbs I like &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2010/01/08/1150/comment-page-1#comment-2826</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightbulbs I like &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=1150#comment-2826</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#8217;ve spent a small fortune on a lovely light fitting, the last thing you want to do is fit a clunky, unattractive bulb. There are some beautiful bulbs on the market now and there really is no excuse for this (see left) anymore, in fact the only reason it&#8217;s still in our bedroom is that (a)  I&#8217;m too mean to change it and (b) it&#8217;s adequate for the job. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;d agree though, it&#8217;s not very pretty and doesn&#8217;t exactly conjure up a mood of romance or serenity! We recently spotted some gorgeous twisted candle bulbs in a hotel inGeneva,  the manager was very keen to tell us they had recently upgraded all the bulbs to energy efficient models and he had a draw full of the &#8220;U tube&#8221; variety (like in the picture) if any guest wanted to take them away! We have 32 light bulbs in our house, shocked? Count yours &#8211; oh and there&#8217;s a string of 100 LED party lights in the kitchen too. We didn&#8217;t replace all our bulbs at once, it took a couple of years. We started with the bulbs we use most, the kitchen, hall and living room. Firstly, we used the freebie U &#8211; tube shaped ones the Energy Saving Trust give away at community events and slowly sought out nicer ones. I also helped set up a light bulb library run by my local Brownie pack, thanks to the very helpful advice of Chris Goodall (author of  How to Live a Low Carbon Life), you can read his advice on light bulb libraries here and a review he wrote of a couple of carbon footprinting tools here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;ve spent a small fortune on a lovely light fitting, the last thing you want to do is fit a clunky, unattractive bulb. There are some beautiful bulbs on the market now and there really is no excuse for this (see left) anymore, in fact the only reason it&#8217;s still in our bedroom is that (a)  I&#8217;m too mean to change it and (b) it&#8217;s adequate for the job. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;d agree though, it&#8217;s not very pretty and doesn&#8217;t exactly conjure up a mood of romance or serenity! We recently spotted some gorgeous twisted candle bulbs in a hotel inGeneva,  the manager was very keen to tell us they had recently upgraded all the bulbs to energy efficient models and he had a draw full of the &#8220;U tube&#8221; variety (like in the picture) if any guest wanted to take them away! We have 32 light bulbs in our house, shocked? Count yours &#8211; oh and there&#8217;s a string of 100 LED party lights in the kitchen too. We didn&#8217;t replace all our bulbs at once, it took a couple of years. We started with the bulbs we use most, the kitchen, hall and living room. Firstly, we used the freebie U &#8211; tube shaped ones the Energy Saving Trust give away at community events and slowly sought out nicer ones. I also helped set up a light bulb library run by my local Brownie pack, thanks to the very helpful advice of Chris Goodall (author of  How to Live a Low Carbon Life), you can read his advice on light bulb libraries here and a review he wrote of a couple of carbon footprinting tools here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Carbon Commentary · Two good software tools for calculating emissions -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2010/01/08/1150/comment-page-1#comment-2824</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Carbon Commentary · Two good software tools for calculating emissions -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=1150#comment-2824</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tracey Todhunter, rance.richman. rance.richman said: Carbon Commentary · Two good software tools for calculating emissions: A critical appraisal of issues in the move ... http://bit.ly/7i3Ul9 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tracey Todhunter, rance.richman. rance.richman said: Carbon Commentary · Two good software tools for calculating emissions: A critical appraisal of issues in the move &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/7i3Ul9" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7i3Ul9</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

