<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carbon Commentary &#187; British Gas</title>
	<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com</link>
	<description>A critical appraisal of issues in the move to a low-carbon economy</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>British Gas&#8217;s new Zero Carbon tariff</title>
		<link>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2007/09/15/9</link>
		<comments>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2007/09/15/9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Goodall</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[British Gas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter #1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ROCs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[domestic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing issues]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carboncommentary.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.carboncommentary.com/wp-includes/images/British-Gas.gif" align="right" />British Gas has launched a consumer gas and electricity tariff that will cost 10% more than its standard rates but which offers better green credentials than any other consumer utility tariff in the UK market.

The product has the following important features:
<ul>
	<li>The electricity is derived from renewable sources. The company says that this is <strong>not the key ingredient</strong> of the tariff. Later in this note I try to explain why.</li>
	<li>British Gas will buy and retire Renewable Energy Certificates for 12% of the electricity it supplies. This is probably the most <strong>important</strong> aspect of the proposition.</li>
	<li>British Gas will 'offset' all of the carbon dioxide produced as a result of each household's purchases. This is the most <strong>expensive</strong> part of the deal for British Gas.</li>
	<li>There will be a small donation to a green education fund for schools.</li>
</ul>
BG says that it makes no extra money from the sale of its Zero Carbon product. This looks a justifiable statement to us. The important other questions to ask are:
<ul>
	<li>Why did BG decide that 10% was the appropriate premium to its main tariff? It could have designed a less costly offering with reasonably strong green features. Do mainstream 'concerned consumers' regard 10% as an acceptable price increment? Did BG need to 'gold plate' the new product to avoid any criticism that it was a proper green tariff?</li>
	<li>How will the company manage to ensure that it buys high quality offsets, and not the dubious offerings sold by consumer offsetting companies?</li>
	<li>The product is slightly complex and difficult to explain. Can BG cut through the competing claims of other green suppliers to build a large customer base for this high quality offering?</li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.carboncommentary.com/wp-includes/images/British-Gas.gif" align="right" />British Gas has launched a consumer gas and electricity tariff that will cost 10% more than its standard rates but which offers better green credentials than any other consumer utility tariff in the UK market.</p>
<p>The product has the following important features:</p>
<ul>
<li>The electricity is derived from renewable sources. The company says that this is <strong>not the key ingredient</strong> of the tariff. Later in this note I try to explain why.</li>
<li>British Gas will buy and retire Renewable Energy Certificates for 12% of the electricity it supplies. This is probably the most <strong>important</strong> aspect of the proposition.</li>
<li>British Gas will &#8216;offset&#8217; all of the carbon dioxide produced as a result of each household&#8217;s purchases. This is the most <strong>expensive</strong> part of the deal for British Gas.</li>
<li>There will be a small donation to a green education fund for schools.</li>
</ul>
<p>BG says that it makes no extra money from the sale of its Zero Carbon product. This looks a justifiable statement to us. The important other questions to ask are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Why did BG decide that 10% was the appropriate premium to its main tariff? It could have designed a less costly offering with reasonably strong green features. Do mainstream &#8216;concerned consumers&#8217; regard 10% as an acceptable price increment? Did BG need to &#8216;gold plate&#8217; the new product to avoid any criticism that it was a proper green tariff?</li>
<li>How will the company manage to ensure that it buys high quality offsets, and not the dubious offerings sold by consumer offsetting companies?</li>
<li>The product is slightly complex and difficult to explain. Can BG cut through the competing claims of other green suppliers to build a large customer base for this high quality offering?</li>
</ul>
<p> <a href="http://www.carboncommentary.com/2007/09/15/9#more-9" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.carboncommentary.com/2007/09/15/9/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
